Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Are Communists (or neo-Communists) Dangerous? 新共产的危险

陈凯一语: Kai Chen's Words:

Since the downfall of the USSR, without the contrast of evil despotism/tyranny, America gradually slides toward the abyss of socialism/communism. The Chinese version of "Soft Cold War", as a alternative to defeat capitalism/freedom, is winning the fight. We must be aware of the danger from Neo-Communism. --- Kai Chen

自从苏俄共产垮台以后,共产主义/社会主义的邪恶被人们渐渐淡忘。 美国正逐渐滑向被用所谓良好意愿铺成的通向共产地狱的深渊。 中国共产法西斯主义正在用其“软冷战”的新技俩在打击资本主义与自由理念中站了上风。 自由的人们一定要警觉“新共产专制”的危险。 --- 陈凯

Are Communists (or neo-Communists) Dangerous? 新共产的危险

By: David Horowitz
Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Last Friday night, O’Reilly and Beck had a back-and-forth about communism (inspired by Beck’s takedown of self-proclaimed communist and presidential adviser Van Jones). O’Reilly opined (I hate that word but he likes it, so there it is) that he was afraid of Islamo-fascists but not of communists. Like many Americans, O’Reilly thinks that because the communist party is almost a thing of the past (it exists but is not and will not be big enough to throw its weight around again), the communist idea is dead. It is not.

It’s interesting that we have words like “neo-Nazi” to describe post-Hitler Nazis, and “neo-conservative” to describe liberals who left the Democratic Party when it took a sharp turn to the left, but not “neo-Communist” to describe the massive numbers of people on the left — and among them very influential people — who share, almost to the jot and tittle, the old communist view of capitalism, and are prepared to act on that perception.

Michael Moore’s new film promises to be a dramatization of this view of capitalism if his communist propaganda film Sicko is any indication. Neo-communists like Moore share the old communists’ antipathy for the United States and sympathy for its enemies, even enemies as evil as Iran and Hizbollah. Noam Chomsky, the self-hating MIT sociopath is a big fan of the Hizbollah and Hamas Nazis, so deep is his hatred for Jews and the United States.

Neo-communism is a view whose members consider themselves “citizens of the world,” not of America, and who therefore agitate for open borders and want the morally repulsive collection of autocracies, slaveocracies and kleptocracies called “the United Nations” to reign over us and the world.

A neo-communist is someone who believes that America is ruled by corporations who put “profit over people” — and thereby show that they don’t understand either profit or people. A neo-communist is someone who is convinced that race, class, and gender hierarchies make it not only legitimate but necessary to describe America as a “white supremacist” society. Neo-communists believe that a revolution is necessary (if not opportune at the moment), that the Consitution is a disposable document, and that America’s communist and Islamo-fascist enemies (Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Hizbollah, the PLO and Hamas), are freedom fighters or at least on the right side of the armageddon that faces us.

These are views shared by The Nation magazine, by Commonsense.org, by the Indymedia crowd, by the social justice movement, by the majority of the Black Caucus and the Progressive Caucus on the Democratic side in Congress, and by tens of thousands of university professors who indoctrinate their students in these pernicious ideologies every day. They are the views held by the leaders of ACORN, the SEIU, AFCSME and other leftwing unions, by radical feminists, by organizations like MALDEF and La Raza, by the ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights who are working to support the Islamo-fascist agenda in America, by the major Muslim organizations including the Muslim Students Association, CAIR, and the Islamic Circle of North America. And I could continue, but why bother? (Those curious enough can pick up a copy of my book Unholy Alliance and read for themselves my views on “The Mind of the Left” and its global struggles.)

This coalition, which I have called the “unholy alliance,” presents a massive threat to America’s security and its individual freedoms and its free market system, and if someone who has been as gutsy in going after America’s enemies generally (and going after the ACLU in particular) as Bill O’Reilly has still doesn’t see this, we have a lot of consciousness raising left to do.


David Horowitz is the founder of The David Horowitz Freedom Center and author of the new book, One Party Classroom.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hi, Friend:

Thanks for the article. If you asked me, whether "Communists (or neo-Communists) are Dangerous", I would - of course - answer : YES !!! I believe that Czechs and also many Chinese people would answer the same.

I think very highly of people, who were (or who are) able to protest against the totality or undemocratic political regime. They are brave and I think that they deserve our respect and backing. They often risk very much, even their lives.

Our former president, Vaclav Havel, was one of 22 former Central European politicians and intellectuals who warned Obama against making concessions to Moscow in summer. The letter is here


As we can see in these days, it was useless. A few days ago, Vaclav Havel said, that Russians only tested, if we are afraid of them. I think that he is right. The missile defense system (shield) wasn't against Russia. It had to serve as a defence of some Asian undemocratic states like Iran or North Korea. And, Mr. Obama made - up to now - one his biggest mistakes. I think that he can be startled by his naivity in the future. Taking it all, I'm almost sure that the best intelligence service in the world was (and it is continually) KGB, which called FSB today.

What are you doing ?
Best regards,